IT BEST PRACTICES

Subscribe to
IT Best Practices.

STAY CONNECTED

    Why Cloud Computing Is Better for the Environment

    It was commonly assumed in the past that the move away from paper by business was beneficial to the environment. After all, less paper use means cutting down fewer trees and less demand for the output of paper mills which consume enormous quantities of water. Instead, the change from print to digital media merely altered the environmental impact. Large scale business use of servers consumes energy both in running and cooling them.

    Given the heavy reliance on coal for power generation in the United States, “going digital” is releasing more CO2 (a greenhouse gas) into the environment. Natural gas is also extensively used for power generation, and although it releases significantly less CO2 than coal, it is nevertheless a contributor.

    However, the increasing business use of cloud computing should reduce power consumption because of consolidation. Businesses that have their own on-site servers tend to use them inefficiently. They are sized to handle a peak demand which is often a forecasted one that assumes greater server use in the future. Therefore, these servers are rarely used at full capacity and mostly sit idle and underused while using up power.

    By contrast, servers in the shared data centers of cloud computing are utilized at a higher capacity because the aggregated demand of their customers have a smoothing effect. The peak demand of some customers occur during the idling periods of others. The same computing is therefore accomplished with less energy-consuming hardware.

    In addition, many data centers have the resources to use more energy-efficient hardware than individual small and medium businesses. The consolidated nature of data centers also allows for more energy-efficient climate control than is possible for the multiple smaller facilities of individual businesses.

    The above assessments have been supported by researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Northwestern University who did a case study showing that Los Angeles could run off the power saved if all businesses in the United States outsourced their computing needs to centralized off-site servers. This comes out to 23 billion kilowatt-hours per year.

    Why Cloud Computing Is Better for the Environment

    It was commonly assumed in the past that the move away from paper by business was beneficial to the environment. After all, less paper use means cutting down fewer trees and less demand for the output of paper mills which consume enormous quantities of water. Instead, the change from print to digital media merely altered the environmental impact. Large scale business use of servers consumes energy both in running and cooling them.

    Given the heavy reliance on coal for power generation in the United States, “going digital” is releasing more CO2 (a greenhouse gas) into the environment. Natural gas is also extensively used for power generation, and although it releases significantly less CO2 than coal, it is nevertheless a contributor.

    However, the increasing business use of cloud computing should reduce power consumption because of consolidation. Businesses that have their own on-site servers tend to use them inefficiently. They are sized to handle a peak demand which is often a forecasted one that assumes greater server use in the future. Therefore, these servers are rarely used at full capacity and mostly sit idle and underused while using up power.

    By contrast, servers in the shared data centers of cloud computing are utilized at a higher capacity because the aggregated demand of their customers have a smoothing effect. The peak demand of some customers occur during the idling periods of others. The same computing is therefore accomplished with less energy-consuming hardware.

    In addition, many data centers have the resources to use more energy-efficient hardware than individual small and medium businesses. The consolidated nature of data centers also allows for more energy-efficient climate control than is possible for the multiple smaller facilities of individual businesses.

    The above assessments have been supported by researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Northwestern University who did a case study showing that Los Angeles could run off the power saved if all businesses in the United States outsourced their computing needs to centralized off-site servers. This comes out to 23 billion kilowatt-hours per year.

    Subscribe to
    IT Best Practices.

    STAY CONNECTED

      ALL ARTICLES

      Cloud Services

      Component Highlight: Veeam Data Protection and Backup

      READ MORE
      Cloud Services

      Meet the team – A word (or two) from our CEO, Reyner Natahamidjaja

      READ MORE
      Cloud Services

      Why you need a full cloud platform, and the pitfalls of going piecemeal

      READ MORE
      Cloud Services

      Component Highlight: IBM Flash Storage

      READ MORE
      Cloud Services

      Can You Trust Your Old Data with Hyperscale Providers?

      READ MORE
      Cloud Services

      Increasing Data Integrity & Security through multi-site replication with CloudKey

      READ MORE
      Cloud Services

      The Dissolution of AWS and their Cloud Monopoly

      READ MORE
      Cloud Services

      Meet the team – The Insights of Chris Martin

      READ MORE
      Cloud Services

      Component Highlight: Palo Alto Firewalls and Edge Security Services

      READ MORE
      Cloud Services

      How the right cloud platform can reduce your RTO and RPO

      READ MORE

      You Have The Momentum. We Help Keep It Going.

      At Global IP Networks, our mission is to keep your net working. Our team of dedicated, certified IT experts is 100% committed to your success. For over 20 years, we’ve relentlessly helped companies like yours tackle their IT challenges to maximize the security, uptime and performance of their networks.

      That’s tenacity. That’s Global IP Networks.

      wLearn More